Code: 5151AE (Registration Number 017)
The complementary relationship between “prayer rug earth-garden” and
“tower to heaven”--concept is to be commended.
Environmentally sensitive.
Absence of clear plans and sections makes the proposal difficult to
understand.. Functionally and technically proposal remains unsolved.
Small plan of the tower floors is not feasible.
Entrances are not identifiable.
3.
Code: 2144JM (Registration Number
024)
The vertical façade in contrast with the draped facade has strong
conceptual possibility in locating and orienting this building in its
natural and urban context.
The functional sub-division above conference hall needs further studies
The structural clarity and its possibility of double skin facade is
commendable and has environmental advantages for interior spaces.
Architectural planning for a multistory building needs to be resolved, for
both terms of the core and usable areas.
The structural implication for clear span of plenary and conference hall
should be studied.
The cost must be also justified.
4.
Code: 1342CP (Registration Number
025)
Shape and form of the tower is reminiscent of early minaret and many
people from Islamic world can associate with it.
As a structure it is feasible, but should be developed.
The use of light both during the day and night is very impressive.
As the interplay of external lighting will be the main feature of the
scheme it must be clearly stated in the proposal of the mechanics.
The geometric pattern normally use on walls of Islamic buildings is
indiscriminately used on the garden floor. The calligraphic layout on the
garden floor, for example the Arabic text should be avoided.
No clear circulation.
There is no clear public place at the foot of the tower and it need to be
developed together with the landscape.
5.
Code: 0122MM (Registration Number 044)
Spatial complexity of the building within functional and structural
organization is strong point in the scheme.
The day and night transformation of the solid and void is commendable
Site planning isn’t clear in its traffic floor and it is excessively
formal.
6.
Code: 0511MM (Registration Number 050)
The formal inspiration from cosmos, landscape, nature and tradition are
impressive, and poetic.
Planning is not shown at all and serious attention needs to be paid to it.
The fenestration on the curved high rise needs more study.
Challenges of construction must be studied. At the same time it appears
artificially de-constructivist.
7.
Code: 4597MB (Registration Number
051)
The attempt to relate the formal organization of proposal to geographic
diversity of Muslim nations is a strong point.
The excessive complexity can be reconsidered.
The institution should have a sense of stability and continuity.
The plan exudes dramatic sense of movement for a large crowd.
The scheme excludes movement and dynamism but also appears artificially
de- constructivist.
8.
Code: 13981 (Registration Number
053)
The urban vision is commendable.
Formality and symmetry system of the cube should be handled with ingenuity
and clarity in order to achieve culturally, symbolically, architecturally
richer and deeper scheme.
9.
Code: MY2006 (Registration Number
060)
Very sophisticated design.
Inspiration from the wind and sand has been handled with sensitivity and
awareness of contemporary technology.
Structural feasibility should be carefully examined.
Use of traditional pattern on the surfaces should be critically reviewed.
Project needs careful gardening and landscape design.
10.
Code: J01A04 (Registration Number 064)
Serious analyses of the Islamic city is commendable.
Attempt at three dimensional transformations in the vertical direction
creates potential for some very special experiences which, however, was
not clearly drawn.
The use of geometric pattern on the surface should be revisited.
JURY
1. Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu, Secretary General of the OIC, President
2. Aadill Mohammed Abdul Qadir Faqih, Mayor of Jeddah
3. Turgut Cansever, Turkey
4. Bodo Rasch, Germany
5. Saleh Al-Hathloul, Saudi Arabia
6. Gulzar Haider, Pakistan
7. Hijjas bin Kasturi,Malasya
Competition Coordinator: Amir Pašić
Istanbul, March 6, 2006
Aiming to protect anonymity till the end of the competition, we kindly ask
all ten winners of Phase One to contact us by phone to agree on the mode
of future communication.